Here's a composite shop. It runs seven service vans that go home with plumbers, one on-call van that rotates weekly, a utility-body truck with a mounted jetter, two construction pickups that stay at a new-build site all week and a 3/4-ton pickup that tows a trailer jetter.
The schedule after review| Unit | Where it sleeps | Value notes | Driver rule |
|---|
| Seven service vans | Each plumber's home ZIP | Shelving, bins and racks added to each van's value | Assigned plumber only; no household drivers |
|---|
| On-call van | Listed at the shop, with a note explaining the weekly rotation | Upfit included | Plumbers on the rotation only |
|---|
| Utility body with mounted jetter | Shop yard | Truck and jetter scheduled together at installed cost | Drain techs only |
|---|
| Pickup and trailer jetter | Shop yard | Trailer and jetter on their own line at a stated value | Drain techs signed off for towing |
|---|
| Two construction pickups | The job site, back to the shop on weekends | Standard | Foremen only |
|---|
Before the review, every unit was listed at the shop address, the trailer jetter wasn't on the schedule at all, and nothing in writing said whether family members could drive the take-home vans. Three changes addressed it: correcting the garaging, adding the trailer with its value and adopting a one-page take-home rule that each plumber signed.
Correcting garaging can nudge the price either way, because home ZIPs often rate differently from the shop's. The other two changes barely moved the price, but they closed the two gaps most likely to turn a routine loss into an argument.