A tree service runs two crews. Crew one has a crew-cab chip truck rated just under 26,001 lbs and a small drum chipper. Crew two has a larger chip truck rated around 33,000 lbs, a bigger chipper and a forestry bucket truck. The company also owns a stump grinder on a trailer and two pickups for the owner and the estimator.
Where each unit is insured| Unit | Auto schedule | Equipment policy | Notes |
|---|
| Chip truck, under 26,001 lbs | Yes, with the box in its value | No | Crew members with regular licenses may drive it |
|---|
| Chip truck, about 33,000 lbs | Yes, with the box in its value | No | Commercial-license drivers only |
|---|
| Small chipper | Yes, as a trailer | No | Rarely leaves the truck it's paired with |
|---|
| Large chipper | No | Yes, on the floater | Covered on the road, at jobs and in the yard; auto carrier told it's towed |
|---|
| Forestry bucket truck | Yes, with the aerial device in its value | No | Work aloft usually goes to general liability |
|---|
| Stump grinder and trailer | The trailer | The grinder | Two items on two policies |
|---|
| Two pickups | Yes | No | Owner and estimator |
|---|
The table doesn't argue that one approach is right. It shows that every unit has a home and the owner knows which policy to call when something happens. Here the large chipper sits on the floater because the owner wanted one policy covering it on the road, at jobs and in the yard, including the weeks it's parked at a long job; the small chipper rides on the auto schedule because it never leaves its truck. Both choices can hold up. Leaving the large chipper on neither, which is what we found when we first reviewed the account, didn't.